DNC seeks to intervene in GOP lawsuit challenging 225,000 voter registrations

Carolina Journal photo by Mitch Kokai

Listen to this story (5 minutes)

  • The Democratic National Committee wants to intervene in Republicans' lawsuit challenging the procedure North Carolina elections officials used to register 225,000 voters.
  • The Democratic group accuses GOP counterparts of seeking to disenfranchise voters because of a color-coding problem on voter registration forms.
  • Republicans argue that an improper form opened the door for noncitizens to vote in North Carolina's elections.

The Democratic National Committee hopes to intervene in one of Republicans’ recent lawsuits against the North Carolina State Board of Elections. The suit challenges the procedure elections officials used to register 225,000 voters.

“They seek to disenfranchise 225,000 North Carolinians not because those voters did anything wrong, but because — according to them — small portions of North Carolina’s approved voter registration form were improperly color-coded,” Democratic lawyers wrote Friday. “Their claims are unsupported by state or federal law, and their request to disenfranchise voters on the eve of an election is expressly prohibited by the National Voter Registration Act.”

The lawsuit filed in August argues that the elections board failed to require identification from prospective voters to prove citizenship. The Republican National Committee and North Carolina Republican Party said that by violating the Help America Vote Act and not checking the identification of approximately 225,000 voters, the agency opened the door for noncitizens to vote. 

According to the suit:

  • The NCSBE formerly used a voter registration form that failed to require HAVA-required identification information, such as a driver’s license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number. 

Before December 2023, NCSBE used voter registration forms that failed to collect this required information. Specifically, NCSBE collected, processed, and accepted voter registration applications that lacked both the driver’s license and Social Security numbers because NCSBE’s form did not tell the voter the information was required.

It further states that the state board’s noncompliance with HAVA was first raised when a concerned citizen, Carol Snow, filed a complaint on Oct. 6, 2023.

Snow alleged that NCSBE’s voter registration form, which was still in use at the time of her filing, failed to indicate that “the applicant’s qualifying identification of the applicant’s driver’s license number or last four digits of the applicant’s social security number, is required if one or the other have been issued to the applicant.”

At its meeting on Nov. 28, 2023, NCSBE considered Snow’s complaint. At the meeting, and in its Dec. 6, 2023, order, NCSBE acknowledged that its voter registration forms did not sufficiently notify applicants that their driver’s license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number were required in order for their registration to be processed and accepted.

NCSBE further acknowledged using the voter registration form, which failed to comply with HAVA, for approximately 225,000 voters throughout North Carolina. The board granted Snow’s request to change the voter registration form moving forward. It denied Snow’s request to identify and contact voters whose registrations were improperly accepted.

Snow filed a new complaint earlier this year charging that the verification process of registrants’ driver’s licenses and Social Security numbers didn’t go far enough.

The board voted 4-1 against the complaint.

The RNC and NCGOP said the board “has refused to take remedial action and did not reach out to these voters to collect the required information. The agency has offered a half-hearted promise to North Carolinians that those ineligible to register, but were allowed to anyways, will naturally filter themselves out.”

Elections board spokesman Patrick Gannon told Carolina Journal in an emailed statement that the lawsuit asks for an impossible solution, adding that despite being aware of their alleged claims months ago, the plaintiffs waited until two weeks before the start of voting to seek a court-ordered program to remove thousands of existing registered voters.

“Federal law itself prevents such removal programs if they take place after the 90th day before a federal election, which was August 7,” he told CJ. “So, the lawsuit is asking for a rapid-fire voter removal program that violates federal law.” 

Gannon also said that the lawsuit also misunderstands the data and vastly overstates any alleged problems with voter registrations.

The RNC and NCGOP filed a separate suit claiming that state election officials are ignoring a 2023 state law requiring removal from the voting rolls of noncitizens identified through jury questionnaires.

Related