News: CJ Exclusives

Leandro consultants call for big boost in public-school spending

Melanie Dubis, the attorney representing the Leandro plaintiffs, argues before Superior Court Judge David Lee in February 2018. (CJ photo by Lindsay Marchello)
Melanie Dubis, the attorney representing the Leandro plaintiffs, argues before Superior Court Judge David Lee in February 2018. (CJ photo by Lindsay Marchello)

A long-anticipated report from an education consulting group suggests North Carolina should boost public school spending by at least $8 billion over the next eight years to satisfy its constitutional obligations.

The report doesn’t address where policymakers will get the money.

The 300-page report from WestEd, a California-based firm, is the latest development in the 25-year-old Leandro lawsuit dealing with the state’s failure to provide “a sound basic education” to every North Carolina child. Retired Superior Court Judge David Lee and the Leandro parties got the report in June, but it wasn’t released publicly until Tuesday, Dec. 10.

One attention-grabbing conclusion: The state would need to spend an extra $860 million over the next eight years just on students who “are projected to achieve average annual, grade-level growth.” Students in schools that are not currently meeting proficiency targets would need more.

Based on WestEd’s calculations, the state spends $8.29 billion yearly on public schools. Local school districts and federal funds provide an additional $3.87 billion a year.

The report cites $8.6 billion as the total state spending on K-12 and early childhood education in the 2018-19 budget year. 

“The study’s analysis of needed resource investment over the next eight years suggests the following:

  • K–12 education operating expenditures (short-term): Invest $3.2 billion (approximately $395 million per year) over the next eight years that would provide intervention support to ensure students achieve at grade level. These investments would be withdrawn from the system after such student achievement levels are reached.
  • K–12 education operating expenditures (ongoing): Invest $3.7 billion (approximately $463 million per year) over the next eight years that would allow students to maintain grade-level growth.
  • Early childhood education: Invest an additional $1.18 billion in programs such as NC Pre-K and Smart Start.
  • State-level infrastructure: Invest an additional $15.5 million in programs such as teacher and principal development and the state’s system of support.”

“It would appear impossible to hike state K-12 and early childhood education spending by more than $1 billion a year without a major tax increase,” said Mitch Kokai, John Locke Foundation senior political analyst. “It would amount to a more than 10% increase in current state spending on these items. There doesn’t appear to be enough room in a $24 billion General Fund budget to meet that spending goal simply by shifting priorities.”

The action plan, says the report, assumes continued increases in investment by the state over the next four budget cycles. 

“Consistent with this assumption, education investments over the most recent biennium (fiscal 2018–19) and proposals for the next biennium (fiscal 2020–21) provide increased investments by the state in North Carolina’s early childhood education and K–12 education systems,” the report says.

From WestEd report on Leandro lawsuit

Leandro dates to 1994, when five rural school districts sued the state, arguing they couldn’t raise enough tax revenue locally to provide an education for their students on par with schools in wealthier districts. In 1997, the state Supreme Court held that every North Carolina child has a right to “a sound, basic education” under the state constitution. In 2004, the court ruled the state failed to live up to the previous ruling. 

The parties in the long-running Leandro case agreed to commission an independent third party, WestEd, to develop recommendations for how the state could comply with the Leandro standards. 

The voluminous report comes to conclusions taken from eight critical-need areas identified in the research. Short- and long-term actions and investments are needed, the report says. They include revising the state funding model to provide adequate, efficient, and equitable resources. 

  • Revise the state funding model to provide adequate, efficient, and equitable resources.
  • Provide a qualified, well-prepared, and diverse teaching staff in every school.
  • Provide a qualified and well-prepared principal in every school. 
  • Provide all at-risk students with the opportunity to attend high-quality early childhood programs to ensure they can begin kindergarten fully ready to learn. 
  • Direct additional resources, opportunities, and initiatives to economically disadvantaged students. 
  • Revise the student assessment system and school accountability system to provide actionable data and monitor progress toward compliance with the Leandro requirements. 
  • Build an effective regional and statewide system of support for the improvement of low-performing and high-poverty schools in North Carolina. 
  • Convene an expert panel to assist the court in monitoring state policies, plans, programs, and progress over time. 

“Where’s the evidence that this $800 million to $2 billion per year in spending, not just over eight years, but in perpetuity, would actually accomplish the stated goal of a sound basic education for all?” asked Joe Coletti, senior fellow at JLF.

“During the fiscal 2018–19 biennium, the state increased its investment in K–12 education by $847 million and increased its investment in early childhood education by $25.7 million,” the report said. “Further, if the state passes the funding increases currently being considered, it would invest an additional $1.01 billion in K–12 education and $15.6 million in early childhood education, depending on the final agreed-upon investments. These investments represent notable progress toward the additional investment necessary in K–12 education and early childhood education.”

Another finding suggests the state take over all funding for public charter schools. Until recently, the Leandro parties hadn’t discussed charter schools.

“WestEd provides little research justification for their recommendation that the state assume sole responsibility for funding public charter schools. The recommendation seems to be included to appease school districts, which frequently complain about competition from charters,” said Terry Stoops, vice president of research and director of education studies at JLF.

“Rather than seeing charter schools as part of the solution, WestEd researchers treat them as novelties that impede the work of school districts.”

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit touted the report’s conclusions.

“WestEd’s report confirms what the plaintiffs have been saying since the case was filed in 1994: Many children across North Carolina have been, and continue to be, denied the opportunity to receive a sound basic education and additional resources are necessary to meet the state’s constitutional obligation to all children,” said a release from Parker Poe, the law firm representing the plaintiffs.