Reaching Out to North Carolinians
We’re entering last week of the 2006 electoral season, which is why I want to call your attention away from elections and political issues today. Take a break.
Why complain? Policymakers are just thinking about the greater good when they limit our freedoms and ignore our rights.
Taxpayers—the pack mules of big government—can empower themselves to take back control of their money and their lives.
UNC's governors—the largest state university governing board in the nation—is ripe for a pruning and a political root canal.
No matter what happens on Election Day, change is coming to the General Assembly. That’s an eventuality that all people of good faith should welcome with relish.
This week, the aperture of educational freedom widened perceptibly. The agent of change just happened to be the federal government. On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Education announced it would give public school districts plenty of leeway to create single-sex schools and classes.
There is no perfect way to draw political boundaries. What we can say for sure is that the current system is deeply flawed.
Here’s an idea for misusing state-managed funds so bad that the right response, as Deputy Barney Fife might put it, is to “nip it in the bud.”
An annoying habit of mainstream journalism is its tendency to finger-wag and hit you in the face with a we-know-better story. The mother of all finger-waggers showed up on the front page of The News & Observer of Raleigh on Oct. 24.
SEATTLE, WA — Over the past fifteen years, charter schools and teachers unions have battled in state legislatures, the courts, and the media. But with increasing frequency, the two groups are facing each other in the everyday operation of schools.
Elections and effective self-government are not synonymous. It might seem an odd time to say this, with elections in just two weeks, but the point is that other checks exist on politicians besides periodic balloting.
Is market behavior essentially competitive or cooperative? Under circumstances described as the Prisoner's Dilemma, the individual's rational, self-interested actions have perverse consequences for society. But laws that fully define property rights, and laws that protect and uphold contracts based upon property rights, can eliminate most of the perverse consequences that result when property owners' self-interest conflicts with community interest.