The North Carolina Supreme Court has thrown out a lower court’s ruling in a certificate-of-need dispute in northeastern North Carolina.
A bipartisan three-judge trial court panel has upheld the constitutionality of North Carolina’s certificate-of-need law in health care, rejecting a New Bern eye surgeon’s legal challenge.
The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services defended this week its legal authority to file appeals in court disputes involving state certificates of need. A state Supreme Court order last month raised questions about DHHS’ right to appeal CON rulings.
The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services is asking the state’s highest court to reject a Virginia-based health care provider’s appeal in a certificate-of-need dispute. The appeal asks for a legal definition of the term “substantial prejudice.”
A Virginia-based health care provider is asking North Carolina’s highest court to clarify rules surrounding disputes over the Tar Heel State’s certificate-of-need law. A petition Monday asks the court to clarify the meaning of “substantial prejudice.”
The North Carolina Supreme Court is raising questions about state health regulators’ authority to appeal decisions in certificate-of-need cases. A court order Friday calls on parties in a Wake County CON dispute to address the issue.
The full 15-member North Carolina Court of Appeals will not hold a rehearing in a certificate-of-need dispute involving a magnetic resonance imaging machine for northeastern North Carolina. Virginia-based Chesapeake Diagnostic Imaging Centers sought the rehearing after a three-judge appellate panel ruled against Chesapeake in July.
The North Carolina Court of Appeals has rejected a legal complaint over which health care provider can add a new magnetic resonance imaging scanner to serve four northeastern counties.
The battle for a new MRI scanner in northeastern North Carolina exposes flaws in the state's certificate-of-need regime.
North Carolina’s second-highest court could decide whether state regulators made the wrong choice when they allowed one health care provider to maintain a monopoly on MRI machines serving northeastern North Carolina. A three-judge Court of Appeals panel heard oral arguments Wednesday in a case that pits Virginia-based Chesapeake Diagnostic Imaging Centers against Sentara Advanced Imaging Solutions and the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.
Get Reminded When We Go LIVE on Election Night!
