Ilya Shapiro, senior fellow and director of constitutional studies at the Manhattan Institute, discusses key decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2021-22 term and looks ahead to the new term in October. Learn more at “Shapiro’s Gavel.”
Manhattan Institute’s Ilya Shapiro analyzes U.S. Supreme Court’s 2021-22 term
Related
News
Budd, Tillis organize letter demanding Josh Stein protect crisis pregnancy centers
North Carolina’s U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis and U.S. Rep. Ted Budd, who is currently running to join Tillis in the U.S. Senate, organized a letter, sent on July 29, demanding that N.C. Attorney General Josh Stein take action to protect crisis pregnancy centers in the state. Other signatories joining the letter were fellow N.C. Republicans U.S....
David Larson
News
Stein won’t seek to renew N.C.’s 20-week abortion ban
North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein is refusing to take actions to have the state’s 20-week abortion ban reinstated. Stein, a Democrat, released a statement July 21 saying that he would not seek to have the injunction lifted in the Bryant v. Woodall case that had stalled the state’s ban on most abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy.
David N. Bass
News
Redistricting plaintiffs object to N.C. lawmakers dropping state Supreme Court appeal
Two of the three groups of plaintiffs in North Carolina’s redistricting fight object to the latest request from N.C. legislative leaders. Those leaders have asked the state Supreme Court to dismiss lawmakers’ appeal of a court-imposed 2022 congressional election map.
CJ Staff
Opinion
Environmental policy after EPA decision
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against the Environmental Protection Agency’s attempts to regulate emissions and require states to shift to clean energy sources from existing power plants. Environmentalists fear this harm to their cause, but it should be seen as an opportunity. Despite what headlines suggest, this ruling does not prevent the EPA from regulating air pollutants. Instead,...
Elijah Gullett