- A Democratic Wake County Superior Court judge will hold a hearing Monday on the state Democratic Party's request for an injunction blocking the We the People Party from North Carolina's election ballot.
- Democrats accuse presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of using We the People to skirt state laws regarding ballot signature requirements for independent candidates.
- We the People labels Democrats' lawsuit "frivolous." The State Board of Elections also opposes the Democratic Party's request for an injunction.
A Wake County Superior Court judge will hold a hearing Monday in the state Democratic Party’s bid to knock a new third party off North Carolina’s election ballot this fall. Democrats accuse presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of using the We the People Party to skirt state laws for independent candidates seeking ballot access.
Judge Keith Gregory, a Democrat, will consider the Democratic Party’s request for an emergency injunction blocking We the People from the November ballot.
“[U]naffiliated candidates seeking statewide office must gather signatures from 1.5% of the voters in the last gubernatorial election, but new parties need only collect from 0.25%,” Democratic Party lawyers wrote in a court document filed Thursday. “While the signature threshold is lower for a party, the statute imposes ‘additional burdens’ on new political parties ‘to attain and retain such recognition,’ including the duty to ‘inform the signers of the general purpose and intent of the new party.’”
“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a self-declared independent candidate for president,” Democrats added. “In November 2023, Kennedy registered in North Carolina as an unaffiliated presidential candidate and thus had to gather signatures from 83,188 registered voters. But in January 2024, the Kennedy campaign decided that it would be easier to form a new political party — the WTP Party — with the ‘sole purpose’ of placing Kennedy’s name on the ballot. Through this maneuver, the Kennedy campaign purported to cut its signature requirement by five-sixths — from 83,188 to 13,865.”
Democrats cited comments State Board of Elections Chairman Alan Hirsch made on July 16, when the board voted 4-1 to recognize We the People as a political party.
“Board Chair Hirsch found that the WTP Party was a ‘subterfuge’ — a candidate campaign committee masquerading as a political party — but voted ‘reluctantly’ in favor of recognition because ‘it is such a close call that ultimately a court would have to decide’ whether North Carolina law permits that maneuver,” Democrats’ lawyers wrote. “Hirsch explained that he was ‘not sure the Board should be the one that is standing in the way if someone wants to challenge that in court’ and opined that the challenger would ‘have a good case.’”
“The NCDP filed this lawsuit so that a court can decide that important, recurring question,” the Democratic brief continued. “If the Board’s decision stands, the implications are clear: future independent candidates will stop complying with the ballot-access and campaign finance requirements the General Assembly enacted for unaffiliated candidates. Future candidates will simply follow the easier path to ballot access — and to significantly more permissive campaign finance rules — by creating a single-candidate, single-election ‘political party.’ If the Kennedy Campaign succeeds in its efforts, North Carolina can expect a flood of candidates masquerading as political parties to follow this strategy in 2026 and beyond.”
We the People filed a brief this week labeling the North Carolina Democratic Party’s lawsuit “frivolous.”
“NCDP does not allege that We the People Party failed to fulfill any applicable statutory requirement, nor that the Board lacked statutory authority to certify the party,” wrote lawyers for the third party, including attorneys from the Center for Competitive Democracy in Washington, DC, and the More Voter Choice Fund in West Hurley, New York.
“NCDP cannot truthfully assert such allegations because all parties concede that We the People Party’s petitions were sufficient under North Carolina law,” the brief continued. “Under such circumstances, the mandatory language of § 163-96(a)(2) required the Board to certify We the People Party as a new political party.”
“NCDP nonetheless alleges that the Board’s certification of We the People Party was ‘in violation of North Carolina law,’ but pointedly fails to cite any statutory provision that was allegedly violated,” We the People’s lawyers added.
“More important, it is well-settled that We the People Party has a First Amendment right to form a political party,” the brief continued. “NCDP’s attempt to assert a cause of action against We the People Party for exercising this fundamental right is squarely foreclosed by decades of Supreme Court precedent, which NCDP conspicuously fails to address. Not surprisingly, given the utter lack of legal grounds for NCDP’s claims, its Brief … is nearly devoid of citation to any authority recognizing the First Amendment rights implicated here.”
“But the extraordinary relief that NCDP seeks – a court order prohibiting the Board from certifying We the People Party as a political party despite its full compliance with North Carolina law – would violate those rights,” We the People’s lawyers argued.
“NCDP has a history of pursuing frivolous litigation that, like this lawsuit, seeks to suppress North Carolina voters’ choices by removing duly qualified new parties from the ballot,” the brief continued. We the People cited Democrats’ efforts to block the Green Party from North Carolina’s election ballot in 2022.
The State Board of Elections filed its own brief opposing Democrats’ injunction request.
“At bottom, Plaintiff’s argument turns on the notion that a new political party cannot be formed for the sole purpose of placing a particular candidate on the ballot. That limitation, however, cannot be found in state law,” the elections board’s lawyers wrote. “Moreover, even if state law did contain such a limitation on the purpose of a political party, the evidence before the State Board established that the We The People Party (‘WTP’) was not created for the sole purpose of placing a specific individual on the ballot. This Court should therefore reject Plaintiff’s incorrect interpretation of state law and uphold the State Board’s decision to certify WTP for inclusion on the ballot this election cycle.”
Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, appointed Gregory to his Superior Court post in May 2018. Voters elected him to an eight-year term later that year. Former Gov. Bev Perdue, also a Democrat, appointed Gregory as a Wake County District Court judge in 2010. He won elections to that post in 2010 and 2014.