News

Target in Robeson video sweepstakes case defends game in court

The owner of video sweepstakes games targeted in a Robeson County case is asking the state Court of Appeals to reject a request from state law enforcement leaders. Those leaders want the state’s second-highest court to block a trial court order allowing the sweepstakes business to continue operations.

CJ Staff
News

Split state Appeals Court backs Cooper’s request in Forsyth sweepstakes dispute

A split panel of the state Court of Appeals has voted to block a trial court order in Forsyth County favoring video sweepstakes operators. Gov. Roy Cooper and state law enforcement leaders had asked the state’s second-highest court to take that step.

CJ Staff
News

Sweepstakes owners counter Cooper’s plea to overturn lower court injunction

Companies involved in a video sweepstakes dispute with Gov. Roy Cooper and top state law enforcement officials urge the state’s second-highest court to stay out of the fight. Cooper is trying to block a Forsyth County court order favoring the companies.

CJ Staff

Help Support Non-profit Journalism & Donate Today

News

Plaintiffs counter Cooper’s arguments in Forsyth video sweepstakes case

Plaintiffs in a Forsyth County video sweepstakes lawsuit reject Gov. Roy Cooper’s motion seeking a temporary stay from the N.C. Court of Appeals. Plaintiffs are asking the state’s second-highest court to let a trial court ruling stand while the legal battle continues.

CJ Staff
News

State Supreme Court deals another blow to video sweepstakes operators

A unanimous N.C. Supreme Court has issued another ruling against video sweepstakes operators. “Gift Surplus, LLC, and Sandhill Amusements, Inc., (plaintiffs) sued Governor Roy Cooper and several state law enforcement officials (defendants) seeking a declaratory judgment that their operation of a sweepstakes through video game kiosks does not violate … North Carolina’s criminal prohibition on...

CJ Staff
News

N.C. Appeals Court Strikes Down Ban on Video Sweepstakes

RALEIGH — The state argued that the ban on sweepstakes machines violated conduct, not speech. A two-judge majority of the state Court of Appeals disagreed, citing U.S. Supreme Court precedent protecting the First Amendment's protections on disseminating information.

Michael Lowrey